Portfolio Construction

Market Know-How 3Q 2025

4 July 2025 | 10 minute read
Download
Author(s)
Avatar
James Ashley
International Head of Strategic Advisory Solutions
Avatar
Simona Gambarini
Senior Market Strategist, Strategic Advisory Solutions
Avatar
Adrien Forrest
Senior Market Strategist, Strategic Advisory Solutions
Geopolitical and trade policy uncertainty is forcing difficult decisions for policymakers and prompting many investors to reconsider risk exposures.
Key Takeaways
1
Cautious Optimism
Despite recent tensions in the Middle East, latest tariff de-escalation has improved the prospects for the global economy compared with what seemed likely after “Liberation Day”.
2
Downside Risks Persist
Tariffs are lower, but not low. Geopolitical risks and policy unpredictability remain heightened and may continue to drive market volatility in the coming months.
3
Expand Your Horizons
We believe investors should remain moderately pro-risk and consider broader equity exposures outside of the US, income generation across and within asset classes, and tail-risk hedges.

Trade-Offs

Geopolitical and trade policy uncertainty is forcing difficult decisions for policymakers and prompting many investors to reconsider risk exposures.

Because the size, breadth, and timing of tariffs are constantly changing and unclear, the range of possible economic and policy outcomes (like growth, inflation, interest rates, and fiscal policy) is much broader than normal. Uncertainty around the scope, intensity, and duration of the conflict in the Middle East is muddling the picture further. In this environment, investors are forced to consider many different possibilities and guess how likely each one is. This makes it extremely difficult to analyze what will happen to equity earnings, credit spreads, interest rates, and currencies.

It’s a complex environment with numerous trade-offs, but we believe eliminating risk entirely by taking trades off isn't the answer. We believe the volatility stemming from current uncertainties prompts consideration that portfolios be adjusted to strategies that likely cannot only withstand but potentially capitalize on this environment. Yet uncertainty is no excuse for inertia.

In this Market Know-How, we highlight three such strategies.

  • The US equity market's dominance faces challenges, we explore active investment opportunities in developed markets outside the US.
  • With inflation and fiscal concerns driving yields higher, we see opportunities in diversified multi-asset income strategies.
  • Anticipating continued volatility, we see merit in allocating to liquid alternative strategies.

Ultimately, we believe this environment of economic and policy trade-offs presents potential opportunities for investors to consider new positions.

Short-Term Macro Themes

We expect weaker global growth in 2H25, reflecting headwinds from higher US tariffs, even though the projected drag has been scaled back after US-China détente. Regionally, we anticipate activity to stabilize below trend in the US, and Euro area growth to stagnate before re-accelerating in 2026 on the back of increased defense spending. Meanwhile, a US-China trade deal bodes well for Emerging Markets, but uncertainty around US policy and geopolitical developments remains high.

Fiscal Takes Centre Stage

  • After more than a decade of supportive monetary policy followed by a historical tightening post pandemic, we believe that attention is now shifting towards fiscal policy. Governments look to progress on their political agenda while navigating greater defense needs, trade uncertainty and high borrowing costs. We think that fiscal policy will increasingly influence and steer markets, as future monetary policy moves appear limited and largely anticipated by market participants.
  • In the US, tariffs are likely to remain in place despite recent legal challenges. Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research (GIR) expects the US effective tariff rate to rise by about 14pp.1 The budget bill looks to be more stimulative than expected with the growth impulse likely to be frontloaded. Consequently, the net fiscal implications of the budget stimulus (lower tax revenues) need to be set against the implications of import tariffs (higher tax revenues). But this would still leave the US on an unsustainable fiscal trajectory over the long term.
  • Outside the US, most countries have so far prioritized negotiating trade deals rather than retaliating with in-kind measures. Trade uncertainty has prompted governments to reconsider their focus on reducing deficits, with Europe increasing defense and infrastructure spending, China focusing on reviving domestic consumption, and Japan attempting to cushion its consumers and businesses from the tariff blow.
  • More fiscal spending generally means more bond issuance. Developed market governments are exploring new strategies to manage rising bond issuance in an environment of higher rates while avoiding a similar crisis to the 2022 UK Gilt sell-off. It seems increasingly likely that short-term maturity bonds will continue to be the preferred form of refinancing, effectively shortening the maturity of outstanding debt. While this strategy allows governments to avoid locking in elevated interest rates, it also creates greater short-term liquidity demands, potentially leading to new vulnerabilities.

US: Hard vs Soft Data

  • A major challenge in economic analysis arises when hard and soft data present conflicting signals. In the US, while hard data have so far indicated economic resilience and moderating inflation, survey data suggest a sharp decline in growth and rising consumer prices. This unusual divergence poses significant issues for policymakers. In our view, survey data are more likely to catch up with official data than the other way around. That said, we expect the US economy to grow at a slower pace this year - about half the pace recorded last year - and inflation to pick up by about 1pp over the next 12 months as tariffs take effect.
  • The key question revolves around how economic actors will respond to the tariffs. Will international exporters reduce prices to protect their market share? Will US importers partially absorb higher costs to support sales volumes, or will they fully pass the tariff on to consumers? GIR estimates that 70% of the tariff will likely be passed on to consumers but there is a high degree of uncertainty. For example, FOMC Governor Waller2 suggested that the burden might be distributed equally among consumers, importers and exporters. In that case the jump in consumer prices might be more limited than we currently expect but could lead to increased layoffs as companies defend their margins by lowering costs.

Europe: Trade vs Security

  • On past form,3 US tariffs on Chinese goods could cause a shift in Chinese exports towards the Euro area. Based on the experience of tariffs in the first Trump Administration, US tariffs on Chinese goods could cause a shift in Chinese exports towards the Euro area. Despite the potential for rerouting of goods, the Euro area may not be able to capitalize by increasing its exports to the US, as the US is more inclined to source alternative imports from countries like those in South and South-East Asia, which have similar export structures to China. While cheaper imports from China may reduce the inflationary impulse in Europe, this may also negatively impact the Euro area's net trade and overall growth. In the near term, US tariff uncertainty is likely to weigh on Euro area activity, and impact global demand for capital goods, as well as European business investment and hiring decisions.
  • That said, in the medium-to-long term we expect greater defense and infrastructure spending to boost potential growth in Europe. Defense spending in the Euro area is projected to rise sharply, from 1.9% of GDP in 2024 to 2.8% by 2027. We estimate that it could eventually reach 3% based on Europe's military requirements. In Germany, defense spending has already increased from 1.5% before 2022 to 2.1% in 2024 and following recent changes to the country’s fiscal rule, it will now be mostly exempt from debt restrictions. A potential ceasefire in Ukraine, along with plans to facilitate the country's recovery, reconstruction and modernization efforts, could result in additional growth upside in the years ahead.
Diverging Economic SignalsDiverging Economic Signals

Source: Macrobond and Goldman Sachs Asset Management. As of July 1, 2025. "Consumption" corresponds to Conference Board Consumer Confidence minus real Personal Consumption Expenditures. "Inflation" corresponds to University of Michigan 1-year Inflation Expectation minus Consumer Price Inflation. Each indicator is expressed as a z-score where average and standard deviation are calculated since January 2000.

China: External vs Domestic Demand

  • In China, the housing crisis in recent years hasn’t translated into a major economic downturn, largely due to a surge in exports. Policymakers have attempted to address property market oversupply and property-related indebtedness, while boosting confidence, but weakness in the real estate sector persists. Across 70 cities, house prices have fallen by an average of 18% since their peak in September 2021.4 Looking ahead, despite the recent de-escalation in US tariffs, the remaining higher customs duties on Chinese goods are likely to have a significant impact on trade, forcing Chinese exporters to consider other markets. In our view, it's becoming increasingly critical for China to address its domestic issues and revive demand.
  • China should focus on addressing the property markets alongside continued trade-in programmes to boost consumer confidence and drive domestic consumption. Given that China's primary housing market relies heavily on a presales system, the sector is still experiencing liquidity stress due to continued weak home sales. Many developers lack the necessary funding to complete presold homes on schedule. Therefore, we believe further public support from Beijing to directly fund these delayed residential projects, could help the sector recover faster.
  • While consumer goods trade-in programmes may support consumption in the short term, they are unlikely to revive domestic spending sustainably. In our view, certain structural reforms may be needed. For example, increasing the basic pension payments to low-income households would be one impactful long-term strategy. More broadly, we believe additional policy easing is still necessary in H2 as trade tensions weigh on exports and the property sector remains under pressure.

Long-Term Macro Themes

In our view, the next economic cycle will be characterized by higher inflation, elevated interest rates and heightened macroeconomic volatility, driven by six key factors. We believe investors need to position their portfolios for CHANGE.

CHANGE

Climate transition – High level of debt – Ageing demographics – New finance – Global fragmentation – Evolving technology

Countries Which Share Greater Trade With:Countries Which Share Greater Trade With:

Source: IMF Direction of Trade Statistics and Goldman Sachs Asset Management. As of July 1, 2025. “Greater Trade” indicate the sum of gross merchandise trade flows (imports plus exports). For illustrative purposes only.

  • Pandemic-era shortages and rising geopolitical tensions have seen more countries turning inwards and focusing on their economic resilience and national security. All three of the world's largest trading regions – the US, China and the EU - are pursuing policies to diversify the sources of their imports, both as a hedge against potential supply disruptions and to reduce vulnerability to geopolitical uncertainty. In this context, the Trump administration’s latest tariffs are just symptomatic of a more general fracturing of the global economy and increased emphasis on self-sufficiency, particularly in strategic sectors such as Defense, Technology and Healthcare.
  • That said, while China and the US have continued to decouple, the world has grown increasingly more dependent on China and less dependent on the US in the past 25 years, according to IMF data. China's growing importance in the world economy is reflected in its increasing share of global trade, both as an exporter and importer, and dominance in global supply chains. In turn, many countries rely on China as a key export market and source of imports.
  • With the Trump administration pursuing a more confrontational trade policy towards the rest of the world and China increasingly being seen as a “systemic rival”,5 we think that most countries will double down efforts to diversify their supply chains, boost domestic production, and build strategic stockpiles. However, limited fiscal space might make such efforts increasingly difficult, especially given higher defense expense needs. Balancing economic and national security concerns with the need for open trade and cooperation is likely to remain a key challenge, with significant implications for long-term investing, in our view.

Market Themes

High valuations, trade uncertainty and geopolitical concerns warrant a more cautious asset allocation until year end, in our view. We are neutral on equities, underweight credit and overweight rates in the medium term. Given heightened policy risk in the US, we expect continued outperformance of Developed Markets ex US equities and favor high income solutions.

Base Case

Our central scenario is one in which US trade policy uncertainty continues to subside and recent geopolitical risks ultimately moderate, allowing inflation to stabilize and central banks to cut rates a little further. This would be supportive of risk assets globally, but downside risks remain elevated, warranting a more cautious approach. While the global economy may be less sensitive to oil prices than in past cycles, it is not immune. Uncertainty and energy price volatility, combined with the ongoing tariff shock, could still weigh on global growth. Overall, the recent escalation in geopolitical tensions adds to the risks facing the global economy.

Global Trade & Geopolitical De-escalation (Negative Inflation, Positive Growth)

A scenario where tariffs are reduced substantially or even removed entirely, and geopolitical concerns surrounding the Middle East dissipate, would be positive for global growth and disinflationary in the US. This would support risk assets globally and allow faster Fed cuts which would be welcomed by bond investors. That said, long-duration treasuries could remain volatile as lower tariffs reduce revenues and pressure public finances.

Key Implications

We believe investors can position for such a scenario by considering cyclical sectors, particularly those exposed to US tariffs such as autos, and global fixed income.

US Stagflation (Positive Inflation, Resilient Growth)

While not our base case scenario, inflation expectations could move sharply if tariffs were to be entirely passed on to consumers or geopolitical events drive energy prices considerably higher for an extended period of time, affecting their consumption habits and wage demands. While the reduction in trade uncertainty would see growth stabilize at below potential levels, the de-anchoring of inflation expectations could lead to a more permanent inflationary shock. In the event, the Fed would likely pause for longer, perhaps until 2026, and the risk of a rate hike would increase.

Key Implications

In our view, the best tactical inflation hedges in such a scenario would be non-traditional diversifiers like gold, trend-following hedge funds or private assets. That said, investors can also adjust their core exposure by favoring the short-end of the curve within fixed income, and high-dividend stocks within equities.

US Recession (Negative Inflation, Negative Growth)

In the event of a global tariff escalation, both consumers and businesses in the US would be hit hard, with a rise in the unemployment rate and a freeze in domestic investment pushing the US economy into a recession. While higher tariffs may lead to a jump in inflation at first, the weakening in aggregate demand and the labor market would ultimately dominate, easing inflationary pressures and allowing the Fed to cut rates more sharply.

Key Implications

Investors may consider pivoting to more defensive and dividend-paying stocks, extending duration by increasing exposure to government bonds and adding alternatives, such as multi-strategy hedge funds or gold.

Global Equities

OUTLOOK

Mitigating Regional Concentration

In an environment where the long-standing dominance of US equities is being reassessed, many investors are increasingly scrutinizing their equity allocations. The US now commands over 70% of the MSCI World index, which came at the expense of other developed peers like Europe and Japan. While this surge reflects superior US corporate earnings and tech-sector dominance, it also raises concerns about portfolio concentration risk. The mean reversion potential and structural shifts in global growth and policy regimes make a timely case for broader diversification into ex-US equities, in our view. As valuations outside the US appear more attractive, and monetary and fiscal dynamics evolve across regions, the marginal benefit of holding an overweight position in US equities is likely to diminish. We believe that investors should consider the long-term benefits of regional diversification, not just for risk mitigation purposes, but also given the potential upside in under-owned markets that are poised for recovery and structural re-rating.

Finding Value and Diversification in Global Equities

The growth gap between the US and other regions is likely to narrow in the medium term, potentially making non-US markets, including EM equities, more attractive. While tariffs might weigh on growth in Europe and China in 2025, a shift towards more fiscal stimulus may partly cushion the impact and boost potential growth in the years to come, making those markets more attractive. Additionally, ongoing pressure on the US dollar could dimmish the appeal of US assets for non-US investors. Looking at valuations, while they have expanded over recent months, Chinese, European and Japanese equities continue to be cheaper than US stocks, with P/E ratios of approximately 11.2, 14.7 and 16.0, compared to 22.3 for the US.6 From a correlation standpoint, Chinese and Indian equities exhibit lower correlations to US equities, which strengthens the case for regional diversification.

SOLUTIONS

The Rising Dominance of US Stocks in the MSCI World IndexThe Rising Dominance of US Stocks in the MSCI World Index

Source: FactSet, MSCI and Goldman Sachs Asset Management. As of July 1, 2025. Latest data is May 31, 2025.

Seeking Diversified ValueSeeking Diversified Value

Source: Bloomberg, MSCI and Goldman Sachs Asset Management. As of July 1, 2025. Past correlations are not indicative of future correlations, which may vary. Diversification does not protect an investor from market risk and does not ensure a profit.

Multi-Asset Income

OUTLOOK

Tilting Towards Dividends for Income and Resilience

In today's economic landscape of higher interest rates, geopolitical uncertainty, and market volatility, focusing on income-generating investments has become increasingly important. Income, across any asset class, may provide a buffer against market fluctuations and capital losses, making it a key component of a resilient investment strategy, in our view. Within equities, dividends have been a significant driver of total returns in recent years, especially outside the US. While US returns have relied more heavily on price appreciation, European and Asian equities have offered more consistent dividend payouts. This is valuable in today's volatile environment: given persistent uncertainty, focusing on higher dividend-paying markets may enhance portfolio stability and long-term performance. Investors looking to mitigate potential equity drawdowns should consider ex-US equities, in our view. 

Unlocking Credit Yield Potential 

On the fixed income side, we see ample opportunities in credit for income-seeking investors. Securitized credit stands out by offering attractive yields in a landscape characterized by higher-for-longer interest rates. In our view, securitized assets, particularly those with floating rates and low duration, are well-positioned to outperform and deliver income in such environment. Additionally, investment-grade (IG) credit entered the current environment of higher tariffs and rising uncertainty with strong fundamentals. Key credit metrics such as leverage, debt servicing capacity, and liquidity positions were robust as of the end of 2024. We expect that this continued resilience will provide a cushion against downside risks. Despite tight IG spreads, yields remain elevated and enhance total return potential while offering a buffer against potential spread widening. Finally, we see high-yield (HY) credit as more favorable today than in past cycles, characterized by higher quality and shorter duration. This suggests that even in an economic slowdown scenario, defaults may peak at lower levels than in the past while still offering compelling yields.

SOLUTIONS

Dividends’ Share of Long-Term Total Equity ReturnsDividends’ Share of Long-Term Total Equity Returns

Source: MSCI, Macrobond and Goldman Sachs Asset Management. As of July 1, 2025.

IG Spreads Are Tight but Yields Remain ElevatedIG Spreads Are Tight but Yields Remain Elevated

Source: Bloomberg and Goldman Sachs Asset Management. As of July 1, 2025.

Liquid Alternatives

OUTLOOK

Navigating The Elevated Stock-Bond Correlation

The correlation between stocks and bonds has continued to drift higher, something not seen for a long time. Traditionally, 60/40 portfolios7 have been a reliable strategy for moderate risk investors. However, recent years have exposed the limitations of such traditional diversification methods, as equities and bonds became very positively correlated in late 2021. As economies recovered from the pandemic, inflation accelerated causing both stocks and bonds to perform negatively. Liquid alternatives have emerged as a useful tool for diversification in these market conditions. They have historically helped mitigate portfolio drawdowns as they provide differentiated returns during bond selloffs.

Beyond the Classic 60/40 Mix

The relationship between stocks and bonds has become more intertwined, especially during times of high inflation. We anticipate that this positive correlation will continue, given increased scrutiny on debt sustainability and heightened geopolitical uncertainty, even as progress is made in controlling inflation. We therefore believe investors should consider liquid alternatives funded from their bond portfolio sleeve to potentially achieve better downside mitigation and differentiated market exposure. Since liquid alternatives use non-traditional investment strategies that typically exhibit low or negative correlation to stocks and bonds, providing unique return drivers outside conventional markets, they may enhance portfolio risk-adjusted returns compared to traditional 60/40 portfolios during stagflationary pressures, recessions, and generally over the long term.

SOLUTIONS

The New Reality of Global Stock-Bond CorrelationThe New Reality of Global Stock-Bond Correlation

Source: Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs Asset Management, MSCI, as of July 1, 2025. Data is monthly and latest is June 2025. Stocks refers to the MSCI World index and bonds refers to the Bloomberg Global Aggregate index (hedged). Past correlations are not indicative of future correlations, which may vary.

Liquid Alternatives as a Risk-Adjusted Return Catalyst Liquid Alternatives as a Risk-Adjusted Return Catalyst

Source: Bloomberg, Barclay Fund of Funds and Goldman Sachs Asset Management. As of July 1, 2025. Latest is May 2025. 60/40 corresponds to 60% MSCI World Index and 40% Bloomberg Global Aggregate Index (hedged). Currency perspective is USD. Liquid alternatives refers to Barclay Fund of Funds.

1Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research. As of June 12, 2025. “US Daily: A Slightly Smaller Tariff Effect”
2https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/waller20250601a.htm
3https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/economic-bulletin/focus/2025/html/ecb.ebbox202503_02~b2916b44db.en.html
4China National Bureau of Statistics. As of July 1, 2025. Latest data is May 31, 2025.
5https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-trade-relationships-country-and-region/countries-and-regions/china_en#:~:text=The%20EU%20and%20China%20The%20EU%20sees,systemic%20imbalances%20that%20characterise%20the%20Chinese%20economy.
6All performance and valuations data are as of July 1, 2025 and are based on MSCI indices. Latest is June 30, 2025 market close.
7A traditional 60/40 portfolio refers to 60% weight allocated to equities and 40% to fixed income.

Author(s)
Avatar
James Ashley
International Head of Strategic Advisory Solutions
Avatar
Simona Gambarini
Senior Market Strategist, Strategic Advisory Solutions
Avatar
Adrien Forrest
Senior Market Strategist, Strategic Advisory Solutions
Market Know-How 3Q 2025
In a world of macro and political uncertainty, we see ample prospects for investors to turn macro challenges into potential investment opportunities.
market know-how 3q 2025
Start the Conversation
Contact Goldman Sachs Asset Management for a detailed discussion of your needs.
card-poster