Choose Your Vehicle: A Closer Look at Private Market Fund Structures

We do not believe there is a universal best choice between private market fund structures. The decision involves a set of trade-offs along four key dimensions. We believe the assessment should reflect the outcomes of an investment program, rather than a single fund.

Key Takeaways

Advantage: Evergreen Funds

Evergreen funds offer investors better liquidity than drawdown funds, although they are semi-liquid, rather than fully liquid. Evergreen funds also eliminate the complexity of achieving, maintaining, and managing private markets exposure over time, since the fund manager assumes the responsibility for reinvesting proceeds and compounding capital.

Advantage: Drawdown Funds

The universe of available drawdown funds vastly exceeds that of evergreen funds, especially for certain strategies and markets (although investment minimums may constrain access for some investors). Drawdown funds are also advantaged in terms of performance, by virtue of their underlying portfolio compositions and fee structures.

Look Beyond a Fund-to-Fund Comparison

We believe the choice of vehicle structures should be made in the context of achieving the investor’s ultimate goal—an ongoing, steady private markets investment program. The comparison, therefore, should be between such programs, rather than between single funds.

Understanding The Trade-Offs

Evergreen fund structures for private markets are enjoying significant momentum, with assets under management standing at over $320 billion across US- and EU-domiciled funds.¹ Initially designed to better address the needs of individual investors, these structures are increasingly being considered by institutional investors as well. With these structures offering better liquidity, ease of implementation and immediate asset class exposure, investors are wondering, are these structures just better?

We do not believe that there is a universal “best” choice. Rather, the decision involves a set of trade-offs along four key dimensions: liquidity and investor control; program complexity; product availability and access; and performance impact. Evergreen funds are advantaged along the first two dimensions, while drawdown funds are advantaged along the last two. The best choice (or combination of choices) will vary for each investor, based on time frames, relative importance of underlying features, and resources available to manage their private markets program.

Four key dimensions may drive the vehicle decision

Source: Goldman Sachs Asset Management. For illustrative purposes only.

Liquidity | Advantage: Evergreen funds

Most investors understand that drawdown funds are highly illiquid. The structure is designed to match the fund’s liquidity profile to that of its underlying investments. Once capital is called, it is locked up and unavailable to the investor for several years. Liquidity comes from distributions, which are at the discretion of the fund manager and reflect portfolio cash flows: yield (where applicable) and realizations from investment exits. The largest distributions tend to start at the end of the investment period and continue until the end of the fund’s life. Most capital is returned within the first 8-12 years; some strategies can take several more years to distribute all proceeds.

In evergreen structures, investors have better liquidity and significant, but not full, discretion over their investment. Investors can choose when to enter and exit the investment. Monthly or quarterly subscription windows and quarterly redemption windows are typical, with some advance notice required for redemptions. In addition to better liquidity, this structure gives investors better flexibility to adjust their private markets exposures up or down, compared with drawdown fund structures. Fund redemptions are the main source of liquidity. Periodic distributions reflect the yield (where applicable) generated by fund assets, but proceeds from asset realizations stay in the fund and are reinvested into new opportunities. Fund managers can institute subscription queues (to help ensure orderly, disciplined cash deployment) as well as redemption gates. Redemption gates limit the amount that can be redeemed in a given period: 5% of fund assets per quarter is a typical maximum. Gates help avoid asset liquidation at unfavorable prices to meet liquidity requests, balancing the interests of the redeeming shareholders and the ones staying in the fund. However, gates are most likely to be triggered when investors most seek liquidity. As a result, investors should consider these funds to be semi-liquid.

Complexity | Advantage: Evergreen funds

One of the key benefits of evergreen funds is that they obviate much of the complexity of achieving, maintaining, and managing a private markets program over time. This complexity is a real, albeit indirect, cost, and varies by investor.

At the fund level, drawdown funds introduce investor eligibility requirements and complex tax reporting—features important for individual investors but less so for tax-exempt institutions. Drawdown funds also employ a different performance reporting metric, internal rate of return (IRR), than the rest of the portfolio, which reports time-weighted returns (TWR). In many ways IRR is a more challenging metric: it cannot be easily computed from the IRRs of underlying components (either portfolio constituents or by compounding quarterly returns). IRR and TWR metrics may yield different returns for the same underlying set of cash flows, sometimes by a meaningful amount. This makes IRR-based returns hard to integrate into the overall portfolio, and performance comparisons across asset classes difficult.

At the program level, the use of drawdown funds makes for a complex process to achieve and maintain the target allocation. These funds have finite life spans; net asset value (NAV) ramps up during the fund’s investment period and subsequently declines as assets are sold. Investors cannot achieve a steady-state private markets program via a single drawdown fund, or a single investment entry point. Achieving steady-state exposure is a multi-year process of consistently making new commitments each year. A new program may take 7-10 years to reach its target. Once the program is in steady-state, newer funds replace older ones in the portfolio, reinvesting their proceeds into new private markets opportunities to compound capital over time. However, the onus is on the investor to set a commitment pace, identify new funds on an ongoing basis, and manage cash flows and uncalled capital. In a mature portfolio, distributions from older funds can finance capital calls from younger vintages. However, even mature programs may experience a mismatch between distributions and capital calls over shorter time frames, necessitating ongoing liquidity management.

Evergreen funds substantially simplify this process for their investors. They offer consistent exposure to the asset class over the life of the investment and take on the responsibility for reinvesting proceeds from realized investments to compound capital over time. The main responsibility for the investor is to monitor and rebalance the position periodically, so that the amount in the fund remains at the target—similar to managing the allocation to any other asset class. The liquidity profile of evergreen funds also simplifies rebalancing to asset class targets and ranges.

Achieving the target with drawdown funds calls for ongoing new fund commitments...

… but can be achieved with a single commitment to an evergreen fund

Source: Goldman Sachs Asset Management. For illustrative purposes only.

Product availability and access | Advantage: Drawdown funds

Drawdown funds have high investment minimums, making them less accessible to smaller investors. However, for investors able to meet these minimums, the fund universe is extensive, with thousands of new funds coming to market each year across a variety of underlying strategies.² This enables investors to diversify across strategies, geographies, and managers, with appropriate levels of manager selectivity.

Evergreen funds are broadly accessible, with investment minimums of as little as $1,000. However, the number of funds is currently limited. The universe of US-domiciled evergreen funds, for instance, numbers around 200 as of this writing, of which around 120 are at scale. The number differs across asset classes; currently the universe of private credit funds is significantly larger than the universe of private equity funds.³ This introduces considerations about achieving asset class exposure while managing manager concentration risk. While the universe of evergreen funds continues to expand, we do not anticipate that it will approach the scale of the drawdown fund universe in the foreseeable future. In our 2023 private markets diagnostic survey, the majority of general partner (GP) respondents indicated no plans to offer liquid or semi-liquid funds.⁴ The scale and organizational resources required to profitably operate and manage registered funds with periodic liquidity requirements may preclude many GPs from offering these vehicles, and may skew the manager universe towards larger, more diversified GP platforms. This may have implications for the universe of underlying companies in the portfolios. In addition, a perpetual fund structure lends itself less well to strategies in which opportunities are not consistent over time.

“

To properly compare performance, investors should understand the three key dimensions that drive reported differences.”

Performance | Advantage: Drawdown funds

The structural features that advantage evergreen funds in terms of liquidity and complexity also introduce a potential drag on performance. Reported performance will differ along three key dimensions. Investors should understand them all in order to properly assess and compare returns.

Portfolio composition. In drawdown funds, all assets are invested in private holdings. In evergreen funds, the need to provide periodic liquidity means managers hold some cash and publicly traded securities (typically credit instruments featuring steady yield). These assets tend to generate lower returns than the fund’s private markets assets, creating a drag on overall fund returns. The magnitude of the drag depends on the size and composition of the liquidity sleeve, as well as the underlying private asset class. For instance, it is likely to be higher in private equity than in private credit—the return difference between private equity investments and cash/liquid credit is greater than the return differential between private and public loans.
Fee structures: Fees are charged on different bases in the two fund structures. As such, the total level of fees can differ, creating a larger fee drag for an evergreen fund relative to a drawdown fund. In drawdown funds, management fees are typically charged on committed capital during the investment period, switching to being charged on invested capital thereafter (in some strategies, management fees are charged on invested capital throughout the life of the fund). Charging on invested capital means that management fees are only charged on the cost basis and decline over time as investments are harvested. By contrast, evergreen funds typically charge management fees on the NAV of fund assets, which includes the original investment cost basis plus appreciation of assets in the fund. In drawdown funds, carry is paid on realized returns, typically after the cash-on-cash return has exceeded a hurdle rate. Carry therefore peaks in the middle years of the fund’s life and declines as the value of remaining investments declines. In evergreen funds, carry is typically charged based on the total return (realized plus unrealized gains). This means that carry is charged more consistently throughout the life of the fund and grows over time as NAV grows. The headline level of fees tends to be lower in evergreen funds than drawdown funds, offsetting some of the dynamics of charging on a higher capital base. Extending the analysis to a program level, however, shows that for a steady-state program, fees comprise a similar proportion of overall program NAV in both fund structures.
Return calculation methodology: As discussed earlier, the difference in methodology between IRR and TWR calculations means that the same set of cash flows and NAV patterns can result in different reported return figures. A return comparison should consider both structures on the same footing.

An analysis assuming the same underlying private assets in each fund structure suggests that a drawdown structure may offer 2.25-2.75% more annualized net return (time-weighted) than the comparable evergreen structure in private equity. The corresponding difference in private credit is 1.5%-1.75%.⁵

On the other hand, in a drawdown program, uncalled capital creates a drag on overall portfolio returns. This impact is most relevant in the early years of the program, before the program approaches its target and becomes self-financing (distributions from earlier vintages funding capital calls from newer ones). The impact will also vary based on the approach to managing uncalled capital. An active approach can help mitigate performance impact.

Going Head-to-Head: Evaluating An Investment Program

We believe the question of vehicle structures should be considered in the context of achieving the investor’s ultimate goal—an ongoing, steady private markets investment program. The comparison, therefore, should be between such programs, rather than between single funds. A well-structured program includes elements of reinvestment and rebalancing to maintain exposure at or near target. A comparison of a single drawdown fund with a single evergreen fund misses the reinvestment dynamics of the former implementation option and the rebalancing dynamics of the latter.

“

A comparison of a single drawdown fund with a single evergreen fund misses the reinvestment dynamics of the former implementation option and the rebalancing dynamics of the latter.”

Our model, as illustrated in the chart below, analyzes a drawdown and evergreen program for private equity. The evergreen program assumes that the fund is held for 20 years, with exposure rebalanced annually to maintain the desired allocation as a percentage of the overall portfolio. The fund is subsequently sold. The drawdown program consists of annual commitment tranches, sized so that the program’s NAV reaches and subsequently remains a constant percentage of the overall portfolio.

This analysis can help quantify the performance impact of the fund structure choice and suggests several questions to answer, to help the investor arrive at their preferred implementation strategy.

The first question is the investor’s time horizon for their private markets journey. The evergreen program achieves better returns in the first few years of the program, as it is fully invested right away, foregoing the j-curve inherent in drawdown funds. However, over time, the drawdown program generates better returns, the j-curve effect more than offset by fund performance dynamics. The analysis can suggest a breakeven point for returns. For instance, as our model displays, a 20-year private equity evergreen program would achieve a similar return as ~13 drawdown fund tranches (with sensitivity to underlying assumptions). A program of additional annual commitments, e.g., 15-20 total tranches, should come out ahead.

The second question can be an explicit cost/benefit analysis. The excess return of the 20-tranche drawdown program over the 20-year evergreen program can be compared to the investor’s incremental costs of implementing the drawdown program.

Comparing private equity investment programs

Source: Goldman Sachs Asset Management. For illustrative purposes only. These assumptions are for illustrative purposes only and are not actual results. If any assumptions used do not prove to be true, results may vary substantially. The projected evolutions of drawdown funds are calculated using an implementation of the cash flow model described in the paper “Illiquid Alternative Asset Fund Modeling” by Dean Takahashi and Seth Alexander of the Yale University Investments Office, published in the Journal of Portfolio Management (Winter 2002). The projected evolution of evergreen funds is computed by compounding the initial investment by the evergreen fund’s annual net return figures. The evergreen program exposure is rebalanced so that the NAV remains a constant percentage of the investor’s overall portfolio. The drawdown funds’ commitment pacing is determined so that the program NAV remains a constant percentage of the investor’s overall portfolio.

For investors who may have the resources to do a portion, but not the entire, private markets program in drawdown funds, a third question can be, how are those resources best spent?

One potential approach, in this scenario, is to construct a core/satellite private markets allocation. Evergreen funds can offer core exposure to a diversified, multi-sector portfolio of private equity-backed companies. These funds tend to be more diversified than drawdown funds, because of their perpetual life span and likely larger target sizes. As such, we expect them to have less manager-specific risk (performance dispersion)—attractive features for a core allocation. Drawdown funds can act as satellites, complementing the core with customized exposures to desired sectors, geographies, themes, and opportunities, and greater potential for alpha generation. Such an approach is predicated on a certain program size in order to meet investment minimums across the underlying funds.

Another potential approach is to select one asset class to implement with drawdown vehicles and another with evergreens. Comparing the results of the analysis above across different asset classes can help determine the relative efficiency of different fund structures. For instance, the same analysis in private credit yields a breakeven point of ~16 drawdown tranches. This suggests that the investor may find it more efficient to do drawdown funds in private equity, where they would achieve a higher performance differential and return on effort, and evergreen funds in private credit.

“

Portfolio composition will vary across funds, and portfolio management should be considered as well.”

Additional Considerations, And Implications For Manager Selection

This study considered just one aspect of performance differential—the impact of different fund structures. As such, it assumed the same underlying private assets in both the drawdown and evergreen portfolios. However, portfolio composition will vary across funds, and portfolio management should be considered as well.

For the drawdown fund GP, knowing at the outset the total amount of investable assets makes it easier to set position and factor diversification parameters at the beginning of the investment period. Finite, multi-year investment and harvest periods provide the flexibility and discipline for a strategic approach to capital deployment and realizations.

The portfolio management process is more challenging in the evergreen structure, because capital flows are not fully in the GP’s control. GPs must contend with subscriptions and redemptions in a market in which new opportunities may not be consistently available, transactions are not instantaneous, and the market environment is not always equally attractive. Mismatches between cash flows and market attractiveness are to be expected, given end-investors’ poor track record of market timing. Yet, with the liquidity sleeve generating lower returns than private positions, evergreen managers can feel pressure to deploy inflows rapidly. For the GP, managing both the private portfolio and the liquidity sleeve become a critical part of overall return generation in this fund structure. This is one area where GPs can differentiate themselves, and should be an important focus of the manager diligence process.

¹Goldman Sachs Asset Management, from US Securities and Exchange Commission, European Securities and Markets Authority, Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier. As of Q1 2024.
²Preqin. As of June 2024.
³Goldman Sachs Asset Management, sourced primarily from SEC filings and Stanger. Includes all US domiciled evergreen funds. “At scale” is defined as $100+ million of assets.
⁴Goldman Sachs 2023 Private Markets Diagnostic Survey, as of August 2023.
⁵ Goldman Sachs Asset Management. For illustrative purposes only. These assumptions are for illustrative purposes only and are not actual results. If any assumptions used do not prove to be true, results may vary substantially. Drawdown fund returns modeled as the approximate historical returns for drawdown funds over the past 10 years. Cash sleeve return in evergreen fund based on the Federal Reserve’s long-run policy rate; public credit returns modeled as private returns, less long-term historical yield difference between private and syndicated loans.

Author(s)

Daniel Murphy

Head of Portfolio Solutions for Alternatives Capital Formation

Juliana Hadas

Portfolio Solutions for Alternatives Capital Formation

Start the Conversation

Contact Goldman Sachs Asset Management for a detailed discussion of your needs.

Risk considerations and disclosures

An investment in private credit and private equities is not suitable for all investors. Investors should carefully review and consider the potential investments, risks, charges, and expenses of private equity before investing. They are speculative, highly illiquid, involve a high degree of risk, have high fees and expenses that could reduce returns, and subject to the possibility of partial or total loss of capital. They are, therefore, intended for experienced and sophisticated long-term investors who can accept such risks.

Private equity and private credit investments are speculative, highly illiquid, involve a high degree of risk, have high fees and expenses that could reduce returns, and subject to the possibility of partial or total loss of fund capital; they are, therefore, intended for experienced and sophisticated long-term investors who can accept such risks.

Hedge funds and other private investment funds (collectively, “Alternative Investments”) are subject to less regulation than other types of pooled investment vehicles such as mutual funds. Alternative Investments may impose significant fees, including incentive fees that are based upon a percentage of the realized and unrealized gains and an individual’s net returns may differ significantly from actual returns. Such fees may offset all or a significant portion of such Alternative Investment’s trading profits. Alternative Investments are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuation information. Investors may have limited rights with respect to their investments, including limited voting rights and participation in the management of such Alternative Investments.

Alternative Investments often engage in leverage and other investment practices that are extremely speculative and involve a high degree of risk. Such practices may increase the volatility of performance and the risk of investment loss, including the loss of the entire amount that is invested. There may be conflicts of interest relating to the Alternative Investment and its service providers, including Goldman Sachs and its affiliates. Similarly, interests in an Alternative Investment are highly illiquid and generally are not transferable without the consent of the sponsor, and applicable securities and tax laws will limit transfers.

Conflicts of Interest
There may be conflicts of interest relating to the Alternative Investment and its service providers, including Goldman Sachs and its affiliates. These activities and interests include potential multiple advisory, transactional and other interests in securities and instruments that may be purchased or sold by the Alternative Investment. These are considerations of which investors should be aware and additional information relating to these conflicts is set forth in the offering materials for the Alternative Investment.

Diversification does not protect an investor from market risk and does not ensure a profit.

References to indices, benchmarks or other measures of relative market performance over a specified period of time are provided for your information only and do not imply that the portfolio will achieve similar results. The index composition may not reflect the manner in which a portfolio is constructed. While an adviser seeks to design a portfolio which reflects appropriate risk and return features, portfolio characteristics may deviate from those of the benchmark.

Economic and market forecasts presented herein reflect a series of assumptions and judgments as of the date of this presentation and are subject to change without notice. These forecasts do not take into account the specific investment objectives, restrictions, tax and financial situation or other needs of any specific client. Actual data will vary and may not be reflected here. These forecasts are subject to high levels of uncertainty that may affect actual performance. Accordingly, these forecasts should be viewed as merely representative of a broad range of possible outcomes. These forecasts are estimated, based on assumptions, and are subject to significant revision and may change materially as economic and market conditions change. Goldman Sachs has no obligation to provide updates or changes to these forecasts. Case studies and examples are for illustrative purposes only.

THIS MATERIAL DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER OR SOLICITATION IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE OR TO ANY PERSON TO WHOM IT WOULD BE UNAUTHORIZED OR UNLAWFUL TO DO SO.

Prospective investors should inform themselves as to any applicable legal requirements and taxation and exchange control regulations in the countries of their citizenship, residence or domicile which might be relevant.

This material is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell securities. This material is not intended to be used as a general guide to investing, or as a source of any specific investment recommendations, and makes no implied or express recommendations concerning the manner in which any client’s account should or would be handled, as appropriate investment strategies depend upon the client’s investment objectives.

Past performance does not guarantee future results, which may vary. The value of investments and the income derived from investments will fluctuate and can go down as well as up. A loss of principal may occur.

This information discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends, or other broad-based economic, market or political conditions and should not be construed as research or investment advice. This material has been prepared by Goldman Sachs Asset Management and is not financial research nor a product of Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research (GIR). It was not prepared in compliance with applicable provisions of law designed to promote the independence of financial analysis and is not subject to a prohibition on trading following the distribution of financial research. The views and opinions expressed may differ from those of Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research or other departments or divisions of Goldman Sachs and its affiliates. Investors are urged to consult with their financial advisors before buying or selling any securities. This information may not be current and Goldman Sachs Asset Management has no obligation to provide any updates or changes.

Views and opinions expressed are for informational purposes only and do not constitute a recommendation by Goldman Sachs Asset Management to buy, sell, or hold any security. Views and opinions are current as of the date of this material and may be subject to change, they should not be construed as investment advice.

Individual portfolio management teams for Goldman Sachs Asset Management may have views and opinions and/or make investment decisions that, in certain instances, may not always be consistent with the views and opinions expressed herein.

This material is for informational purposes only. It has not been, and will not be, registered with or reviewed or approved by your local regulator. This material does not constitute an offer or solicitation in any jurisdiction. If you do not understand the contents of these materials, you should consult an authorised financial adviser.

United States: In the United States, this material is offered by and has been approved by Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P. and Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, which are registered investment advisers with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

United Kingdom: In the United Kingdom, this material is a financial promotion and has been approved by Goldman Sachs Asset Management International, which is authorized and regulated in the United Kingdom by the Financial Conduct Authority.

European Economic Area (EEA): This marketing communication is disseminated by Goldman Sachs Asset Management B.V., including through its branches (“GSAM BV”). GSAM BV is authorised and regulated by the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (Autoriteit Financiële Markten, Vijzelgracht 50, 1017 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands) as an alternative investment fund manager (“AIFM”) as well as a manager of undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (“UCITS”). Under its licence as an AIFM, the Manager is authorized to provide the investment services of (i) reception and transmission of orders in financial instruments; (ii) portfolio management; and (iii) investment advice. Under its licence as a manager of UCITS, the Manager is authorized to provide the investment services of portfolio management; and (ii) investment advice. Information about investor rights and collective redress mechanisms are available on am.gs.com/policies-and-governance. Capital is at risk. Any claims arising out of or in connection with the terms and conditions of this disclaimer are governed by Dutch law.

In the European Union, this material has been approved by either Goldman Sachs Asset Management Funds Services Limited, which is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland or Goldman Sachs Asset Management B.V, which is regulated by The Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM).

Switzerland: For Qualified Investor use only – Not for distribution to general public. This is marketing material. This document is provided to you by Goldman Sachs Asset Management Schweiz Gmbh. Any future contractual relationships will be entered into with affiliates of Goldman Sachs Asset Management Schweiz Gmbh, which are domiciled outside of Switzerland. We would like to remind you that foreign (Non-Swiss) legal and regulatory systems may not provide the same level of protection in relation to client confidentiality and data protection as offered to you by Swiss law.

Asia excluding Japan: Please note that neither Goldman Sachs Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited (“GSAMHK”) or Goldman Sachs Asset Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Company Number: 201329851H ) (“GSAMS”) nor any other entities involved in the Goldman Sachs Asset Management business that provide this material and information maintain any licenses, authorizations or registrations in Asia (other than Japan), except that it conducts businesses (subject to applicable local regulations) in and from the following jurisdictions: Hong Kong, Singapore, India and China. This material has been issued for use in or from Hong Kong by Goldman Sachs Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited and in or from Singapore by Goldman Sachs Asset Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Company Number: 201329851H).

Australia: This material is distributed in Australia and New Zealand by Goldman Sachs Asset Management Australia Pty Ltd ABN 41 006 099 681, AFSL 228948 (’GSAMA’) and is intended for viewing only by wholesale clients in Australia for the purposes of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and to clients who either fall within any or all of the categories of investors set out in section 3(2) or sub-section 5(2CC) of the Securities Act 1978, fall within the definition of a wholesale client for the purposes of the Financial Service Providers (Registration and Dispute Resolution) Act 2008 (FSPA) and the Financial Advisers Act 2008 (FAA),and fall within the definition of a wholesale investor under one of clause 37, clause 38, clause 39 or clause 40 of Schedule 1 of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (FMCA) of New Zealand (collectively, a “NZ Wholesale Investor”). GSAMA is not a registered financial service provider under the FSPA. GSAMA does not have a place of business in New Zealand. In New Zealand, this document, and any access to it, is intended only for a person who has first satisfied GSAMA that the person is a NZ Wholesale Investor. This document is intended for viewing only by the intended recipient. This document may not be reproduced or distributed to any person in whole or in part without the prior written consent of GSAMA.

To the extent that this document contains any statement which may be considered to be financial product advice in Australia under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), that advice is intended to be given to the intended recipient of this document only, being a wholesale client for the purposes of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

Any advice provided in this document is provided by either of the following entities. They are exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services licence under the Corporations Act of Australia and therefore do not hold any Australian Financial Services Licences, and are regulated under their respective laws applicable to their jurisdictions, which differ from Australian laws. Any financial services given to any person by these entities by distributing this document in Australia are provided to such persons pursuant to the respective ASIC Class Orders and ASIC Instrument mentioned below.

* Goldman Sachs Asset Management, LP (GSAMLP), Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC (GSCo), pursuant ASIC Class Order 03/1100; regulated by the US Securities and Exchange Commission under US laws.

* Goldman Sachs Asset Management International (GSAMI), Goldman Sachs International (GSI), pursuant to ASIC Class Order 03/1099; regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority; GSI is also authorized by the Prudential Regulation Authority, and both entities are under UK laws.

* Goldman Sachs Asset Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (GSAMS), pursuant to ASIC Class Order 03/1102; regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore under Singaporean laws

* Goldman Sachs Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited (GSAMHK), pursuant to ASIC Class Order 03/1103 and Goldman Sachs (Asia) LLC (GSALLC), pursuant to ASIC Instrument 04/0250; regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong under Hong Kong laws

No offer to acquire any interest in a fund or a financial product is being made to you in this document. If the interests or financial products do become available in the future, the offer may be arranged by GSAMA in accordance with section 911A(2)(b) of the Corporations Act. GSAMA holds Australian Financial Services Licence No. 228948. Any offer will only be made in circumstances where disclosure is not required under Part 6D.2 of the Corporations Act or a product disclosure statement is not required to be given under Part 7.9 of the Corporations Act (as relevant).

FOR DISTRIBUTION ONLY TO FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, FINANCIAL SERVICES LICENSEES AND THEIR ADVISERS. NOT FOR VIEWING BY RETAIL CLIENTS OR MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC.

Canada: This presentation has been communicated in Canada by GSAM LP, which is registered as a portfolio manager under securities legislation in all provinces of Canada and as a commodity trading manager under the commodity futures legislation of Ontario and as a derivatives adviser under the derivatives legislation of Quebec. GSAM LP is not registered to provide investment advisory or portfolio management services in respect of exchange-traded futures or options contracts in Manitoba and is not offering to provide such investment advisory or portfolio management services in Manitoba by delivery of this material.

Japan: This material has been issued or approved in Japan for the use of professional investors defined in Article 2 paragraph (31) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law (“FIEL”). Also, Any description regarding investment strategies on collective investment scheme under Article 2 paragraph (2) item 5 or item 6 of FIEL has been approved only for Qualified Institutional Investors defined in Article 10 of Cabinet Office Ordinance of Definitions under Article 2 of FIEL.

FOR INTENDED AUDIENCES ONLY – NOT FOR WIDER DISTRIBUTION
United Arab Emirates: This document has not been approved by, or filed with the Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates or the Securities and Commodities Authority. If you do not understand the contents of this document, you should consult with a financial advisor.

FOR INTENDED AUDIENCES ONLY – NOT FOR WIDER DISTRIBUTION
Saudi Arabia: The Capital Market Authority does not make any representation as to the accuracy or completeness of this document, and expressly disclaims any liability whatsoever for any loss arising from, or incurred in reliance upon, any part of this document. If you do not understand the contents of this document you should consult an authorised financial adviser.

These materials are presented to you by Goldman Sachs Saudi Arabia Company ("GSSA"). GSSA is authorised and regulated by the Capital Market Authority (“CMA”) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. GSSA is subject to relevant CMA rules and guidance, details of which can be found on the CMA’s website at www.cma.org.sa.

The CMA does not make any representation as to the accuracy or completeness of these materials, and expressly disclaims any liability whatsoever for any loss arising from, or incurred in reliance upon, any part of these materials. If you do not understand the contents of these materials, you should consult an authorised financial adviser.

FOR INTENDED AUDIENCES ONLY – NOT FOR WIDER DISTRIBUTION
Kuwait: This material has not been approved for distribution in the State of Kuwait by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry or the Central Bank of Kuwait or any other relevant Kuwaiti government agency. The distribution of this material is, therefore, restricted in accordance with law no. 31 of 1990 and law no. 7 of 2010, as amended. No private or public offering of securities is being made in the State of Kuwait, and no agreement relating to the sale of any securities will be concluded in the State of Kuwait. No marketing, solicitation or inducement activities are being used to offer or market securities in the State of Kuwait.

FOR INTENDED AUDIENCES ONLY – NOT FOR WIDER DISTRIBUTION
Qatar: This document has not been, and will not be, registered with or reviewed or approved by the Qatar Financial Markets Authority, the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority or Qatar Central Bank and may not be publicly distributed. It is not for general circulation in the State of Qatar and may not be reproduced or used for any other purpose.

France: FOR PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY (WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE MIFID DIRECTIVE)- NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION. THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY IN ORDER TO ENABLE THE RECIPIENT TO ASSESS THE FINANCIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CONCERNED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT(S) AS PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE L. 533-13-1, I, 2° OF THE FRENCH MONETARY AND FINANCIAL CODE AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AND MAY NOT BE USED AS MARKETING MATERIAL FOR INVESTORS OR POTENTIAL INVESTORS IN FRANCE.

Compliance code: 386957-OTU-2106161

Date of first use: October 22, 2024